Post by account_disabled on Dec 31, 2023 4:57:17 GMT -5
Ahave the obligation to inform the doctoral student about scientific professional and university ethics and to verify their compliance including a compliance with the deontological provisions during the doctoral research b compliance with the deontological provisions in the drafting and completion of the doctoral thesis c the organization of advanced courses curricular andor extracurricular dedicated to ethics and academic writing. Art. . The doctoral school and IOSUD take measures to prevent and sanction deviations from the norms of scientific professional and university ethics according to the institutions code of ethics and professional deontology.
In the case of academic fraud violations of university ethics Country Email List or deviations from good conduct in scientific research including plagiarism the doctoral student and the doctoral supervisor are responsible according to the law. The doctoral school that does not apply the provisions of the institutions code of ethics and professional deontology and has not promoted or is not consistently promoting measures to prevent identify and combat possible academic fraud especially plagiarism is considered to be in disagreement with the minimum ethical standards of operation and its accreditation is withdrawn. CHAPTER V Final provisions Art. . The criteria standards and performance indicators used in the external evaluation of doctoral schools are provided in the annex that is an integral part of this methodology. Based on them.
Within days from the entry into force of this methodology the authorized agency CNATDCU and CNCS by consulting the associative structures of the universities and representative student federations at the national level will develop the assessment guide for doctoral schools adopted by order of the Minister of National Education and Scientific Research respectively the visit sheets. accreditation and periodic evaluation as well as the operationalization of criteria standards and performance indicators depending on the type and fields of university doctoral studies and other aspects provided for in this methodology will be included in the evaluation guide of doctoral schools.
In the case of academic fraud violations of university ethics Country Email List or deviations from good conduct in scientific research including plagiarism the doctoral student and the doctoral supervisor are responsible according to the law. The doctoral school that does not apply the provisions of the institutions code of ethics and professional deontology and has not promoted or is not consistently promoting measures to prevent identify and combat possible academic fraud especially plagiarism is considered to be in disagreement with the minimum ethical standards of operation and its accreditation is withdrawn. CHAPTER V Final provisions Art. . The criteria standards and performance indicators used in the external evaluation of doctoral schools are provided in the annex that is an integral part of this methodology. Based on them.
Within days from the entry into force of this methodology the authorized agency CNATDCU and CNCS by consulting the associative structures of the universities and representative student federations at the national level will develop the assessment guide for doctoral schools adopted by order of the Minister of National Education and Scientific Research respectively the visit sheets. accreditation and periodic evaluation as well as the operationalization of criteria standards and performance indicators depending on the type and fields of university doctoral studies and other aspects provided for in this methodology will be included in the evaluation guide of doctoral schools.